THE GUERRILLA ANGEL REPORT — A New York state appellate court overturned a hate crime manslaughter conviction of Dwight DeLee who was charged with shooting trans woman Lateisha Green in Syracuse, NY in 2008. DeLee was sentenced to 25 years for that conviction. The appellate court ruled that the jury verdicts in the case were contradictory.
In viewing the few news reports on this ruling, I can’t help thinking there is a bit of information about previous rulings that was left out of their reports — all the news reports sourced the Associated Press. I don’t have full understanding of this particular case, so I’ll just excerpt what I found and leave it to others to interpret it for us.
This is from the Wall Street Journal:
An appeals court has overturned the hate crime conviction of a central New York man in the 2009 slaying of a transgender woman, ruling that jury verdicts in the case were contradictory.
The Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court noted in its July ruling that the jury mistakenly found that Dwight DeLee, 24, was guilty of manslaughter as a hate crime and not guilty of murder or manslaughter.
In effect, the court said, the jury found DeLee not guilty of fatally shooting 22-year-old Lateisha Green outside a Syracuse house party in November 2008.
Four of the five justices said the trial judge should have pointed out that the verdicts were inconsistent with each other and sent the case back to jurors for further deliberation. But one dissenting justice said the conviction should stand because the jury clearly intended to convict DeLee of a hate crime.
Onondaga County Chief Assistant District Attorney James Maxwell said Thursday his office is asking the dissenting judge for permission to appeal to the state’s top court. He said DeLee can’t be tried again for manslaughter because of the earlier acquittal.
. . .
At trial, DeLee was acquitted of murder as a hate crime but convicted of the lesser manslaughter hate crime. The jurors then moved on to a second count in the indictment and acquitted him of simple murder and manslaughter.
When defense lawyers asked the trial judge to vacate the conviction as “inconsistent,” the judge denied the request without explanation, according to court records.
Justice Erin Peradotto wrote in her dissent that the verdict should stand because it “reflects the jury’s determination that the shooting at issue was a hate crime … that the defendant intentionally selected the victim because of his sexual orientation.”
Anyone following the case can leave their comments below.
THE GUERRILLA ANGEL REPORT is associated with Wipe Out Transphobia: http://www.wipeouttransphobia.com/
Read Lexie Cannes in The Huffington Post: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/courtney-odonnell/
Categories: Deaths, Murder, Judicial, Courts, Transgender, Transsexual, Trans
This is outrageous. Some of the background on this case was it’s importance to get hate crime status on an attack of a transgender person. The defendant did not know the difference between gay and transgender and apparently used gay slurs in the attack,
So, as I recall, they had charged him with bias and non-bias crimes trying to get bias to stick, but had a back up plans in place.
This case is one of the ones that really shows the need for GENDA in New York State, because the prosecutors could have just used the hate crime statutes, since being transgender would be protected under the law.
Gonna pray the Court Of Appeals will hear it.
Don’t let this idiot go on a technicality!